..... ...... Welome to the official website of All India Postal Employees union -Tirunnelveli Division... .......NELLAI NFPE .......

Tuesday, July 31, 2012


இன்று (31.07.2012) பணி நிறைவு பெறும்  தோழர் .S .சின்ராஜ்  APM  மதுரை HO ,

முன்னாள் மண்டல செயலர் ,) அவர்களை  வாழ்த்துகிறோம் .

கோட்ட  சங்க  செய்திகள்   

இன்று  நடைபெறுவதாக   இருந்த 

மாதந்திர  பேட்டி  தள்ளிவைக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது . 

அஞ்சல் நான்கு  கோட்ட செயலர்  

தோழர் .SK .பாட்சா  அவர்கள்  பணி சிறக்க 

வாழ்த்துக்கள் .

Saturday, July 28, 2012

Feedback of MACP Joint Committee meeting held on 27.7.2012

28 July 2012

Feedback of MACP Joint Committee meeting held on 27.7.2012 - NFIR

Meeting of the Joint Committee on MACPs Anomalies

As decided in the National Anomaly Committee Meeting held on 17/07/2012, the DOPT held separate meeting with the Leaders of Staff Side at North Block, New Delhi, Room No. 190 on 27/07/2012. Shri.M.Raghavaiah, General Secretary, NFIR has participated in the meeting.

Discussions were held on following issues:-

1. Grant of MACP in the promotional hierarchy :-
The staff side insisted that option be given to individual employees in this regard to facilitate him/her to opt for availing benefit of financial upgradation.
After discussion it was agreed to examine in depth for finding solution.

2. Date of effect of MACP Scheme :
The desirability of giving effect to the MACP Scheme w.e. f. 01.01.2006 will be examined.

3. Counting of total temporary status Casual Labour Service reckoning 10/20/30 years under MACP Scheme:
Official Side stated that this will be processed separately.

4. Treatment of employees selected under LDCE/GDCE Scheme:
In the light of the instructions issued when the ACP Scheme was introduced. The same policy be adopted and accordingly orders will be issued. In other words, those inducted through LDCE/GDCE Scheme, such induction may be counted as appointment and will be reckoned as promotion.

5. Problems faced in the identical Grade Pay:
It was agreed to issue instructions for granting additional increment for fixation of Pay in case of promotion to the same Grade Pay. Instructions in this regard will be issued to Ministry of Railways etc .

6. Financial Upgradation Under MACPs, in the case of staff who joined another unit/organisation on request:
The Staff Side has pointed out that OM dated 01/11/2010 should be suitably Amended covering the staff who were transferred on request on reversion to the Unit/Organisation so that the total service rendered in the previous Unit/Organisation may be counted for MACPs. It was agreed to be considered.

7. Extension of benefit of MACPS to an employee appointed in Grade where direct recruitment element is there while ignoring service and promotion rendered prior to his appointment in that post:
Official Side reiterated that suitable clarification No. 5 of OM dated 09/09/2012 was already issued.

8. Stepping up of Pay of Senior incumbents at par with Junior incumbents as a consequence of ACP/MACPs :
Staff Side has explained the case of gross injustice done, more particularly in the Accounts Department of India” Railways wherein the incumbents who cleared the Appendix examination are drawing less pay than those who could not qualify the said examination and got the benefit of MACPs. The staff side insisted that this situation is leading to de-motivation among qualified staff and urged for rectifying the anomalies. It was agreed to consider and Ministry of Railways advised to send the proposal

9. Employees who got one promotion prior to 01/09/2008 and completed over two decades of service without benefit of promotion and are denied third ACP under MACPs:
After discussion, official side agreed that is a peculiar situation and assured to take action to rectify the situation. The staff side has insisted that in such cases third ACP should be straight away given to staff from the date subsequent to the date of completion of two decades of service after promotion. Official side appreciated the logic and reasonableness and agreed to considered.
Official Side apPft’Cialcd the logic and reawnablencss and agreed to consider.

10. Modification of recruitment rules particularly in Railways and upgradation granted by abolition of Pay Scale-Implementation of MACPs :
The Staff Side explained that in the Railways the lower Pay Scales were abolished and posts were upgraded to the higher Pay Scales with revision of recruitment qualification and designation. In such cases the staff side insisted that entry Grade Pay as a result of upgradation subsequent to abolition of lower Pay Scales should be taken into consideration for reckoning 10/20/30 years of service for granting MACP.

Official side has agreed to obtain detials from Ministry of Railways for issuing appropriate clarification. In the meanwhile, Railway Board will have discussion with the Staff Side separately so that appropritate proposal could be sent to the DoP&T.

11. Placement of staff as a result of upgradation of posts :
The Staff side (NFIR) insisted that such placements should not be considered as promotion for the purpose of grant of financial upgradation under MACP Scheme.
Official side stated that this will be examined.

12. In the course of discussion the Official Side also stated that MACP Scheme should be a fall-back option and the Ministries should conduct Cadre Restructuring for ensuring that the staff could be promoted within the reasonable time i.e. within 10 years. When the Staff Side pointed out that the Ministry of Railways is citing the instructions of Ministry of Finance issued some years back that only one third of the Cadre could be disturbed, for revising the percentages, the Official Side clarified that necessary clarificatory instructions will be issued to the Ministry of Railways etc., so that the Cadre Restructuring can be done without problems.


Wednesday, July 25, 2012

In the issue of Stepping up of pay of the promotee senior with direct recruited junior appointed on or after 01.01.2006, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan has clarified that stepping up the basic pay
Stepping up the basic pay of seniors under the above provision can be claimed only in the case of those cadres which have an element of direct recruitment and In cases where a directly recruited junior is actually drawing more basic pay than the seniors. In such cases, the basis pay of the seniors will be stepped up with reference to the basic pay of the junior.
The full text of this Clarification is as follows.
NEW DELHI-110016
F.110239/58/2008/ KVS (Budget) Dated: 20.07.2012
The Dy. Commissioner
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan
All Regional Offices
Subject: Stepping up of pay of the promotee senior with direct recruited junior appointed on or after 01.01.2006
This is regarding stepping of pay of promotee senior with reference to direct recruited junior appointed after 01.01.2006.
1. The issue was examined in this office and referred to Ministry of HRD for clarification. Ministry of HRD vide letter No.F.3-43/2008/UT.2 dated 20th March 2009 has clarified that the stepping up of pay of the promotee senior with direct recruited junior appointed on or after 01.01.2006 may be agreed to subject to fulfillment of the following conditions:
(a) Stepping up the basic pay of seniors under the above provision can be claimed only in the case of those cadres which have an element of direct recruitment and In cases where a directly recruited junior is actually drawing more basic pay than the seniors. In such cases, the basis pay of the seniors will be stepped up with reference to the basic pay of the junior.
(b) Using the above provision, Government servants cannot claim stepping up their revised basic pay with reference to entry pay in the revised pay structure for direct recruits appointed on or after 1.1.2006 as laid down in Section II of Part A of First Schedule to the CCS (RP) Rules, 2008, if their cadre does not have an element of direct recruitment, or in cases were no junior is drawing basic pay higher than them.
(C) Stepping up of pay of the seniors in accordance with the above provision shall not be applicable in cases where direct recruits have been granted advance increments at the time of recruitment.
The issues prevailing in the region may be decided as per above clarifications.
Yours faithfully
(M.A Arumugam)
Joint.Commissioner (Fin)



Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Exemption of Salaried Employees from Requirement of Filing of Returns for Assessment Year 2012-13

Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) vide its Notification No. 9/2012 dated 17th February, 2012 has exempted salaried employees from the requirement of filing the returns for assessment year 2012-13. The exemption is applicable only if all the following conditions are fulfilled:-

• Employee has earned only salary income and income from savings bank account and the annual interest earned from savings bank account is less than Rs. 10 thousand.

• The total Income of the employee does not exceed Rs. 5 Lakh (Total Income means Gross Total Income Less deductions under Chapter VIA).
• The Employee has reported his PAN to the employer.
• Employee has reported his income from interest on savings bank account to employer.
• Employee has received Form 16 from his employer.
• Total Tax Liability of employee has been paid off by employer by way of TDS and employer has deposited TDS with central government.
• Employee has no refund claim.
• Employee has received salary only from one employer.
• Employee has not received any Notice from Income Tax Department for filing of Income Tax return.

Monday, July 23, 2012

Saturday, July 21, 2012


மத்தியஅரசுஊழியர்களின்0குரூப்இன்சூரன்ஸ்PREMIUM தொகையும் அதற்கானINSURANCE COVERAGE தொகையும்உயர்த்தப்படவேஇல்லை என்பதும், குறைந்தபட்சம்ரூ. 5,00,000/- ஆகவாவதுஉயர்த்தப்படவேண்டும் என்பதுநமதுநீண்டநாளையகோரிக்கை. தற்போதுமத்தியஅரசுஇதனை ஏற்றுக்கொண்டுநிறைவேற்றுவதாகபதில்அளித்துள்ளது. பார்க்ககீழே இதற்கானசெய்தி:-
After a long wait, Government has proposed to the subscription amount and the Insurance Cover under Central Government Employees Group Insurance Scheme (CGEGIS).

Last revision in the Insurance cover and subscription amount was made way back in the year 1990. However, this Scheme was not at all reviewed by Government thereafter while two pay commissions (5th and 6th) have been implemented in the mean time.

Now, Government given some positive signals for the revival of the scheme.

Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance has replied to the JCM NATIONAL COUNCIL that increase in the rate of monthly subscription and amount of insurance cover under the Central Government Employees Group Insurance Scheme is under the consideration of the Ministry of Finance.
These are the details of CGEGIS presently provided by Government.
It came into force from 1st January,1982, and provides employees either the life insurance cover in the case of death during service or a maturity amount in the case of retirement from service.
A portion of the subscription is credited to Insurance Fund and the other portion to the Savings Fund in the ratio of 3:7. The Savings Fund will earn interest at the prescribed rate to be compounded quarterly.
Monthly subscription, life insurance sum assured and Maturity amount applicable for different cadres are as follows
Employee CadreContribution per Month (Rs.)Insurance cover (Rs.)
Features of this Scheme:
  • On Resignation/Retirement :- Amount of subscription credited to the Savings Fund along with interest thereon will be paid to the employee.
  • On Death : Amount of insurance cover of the group to which he belongs on the date of death and the accumulation in Savings Fund will be paid to his nominee/heirs.
  • If an employee dies before he was enrolled as a member (i.e. between the date of his joining service and the following Ist January), only the insurance amount will be paid to the nominee/heirs.
  • Employee can assign the insurance cover and accumulation in the savings fund to a recognized financial institution, for obtaining housing loans. However, no loans/advance or withdrawals are permitted from Insurance Fund/Savings Fund.
  • The amount of subscription is eligible for Income Tax Rebate u/s 88 of IT Act
  • ________________________________________________________________
Central Government Employees’ Group Insurance Scheme (CGEGIS) is the only Life insurance cover sponsored by Central Government as of now for its employees.

The maximum sum assured in the event of death in this scheme is Rs.1,20,000. Remember, this amount is applicable for Group A Officers only. Group B, C and D Officers are entitled for a sum assured to the extent of Rs.60,000, 30,000, and Rs. 15,000 respectively.

Can we stoutly say our life is sufficiently covered under CGEGIS with this meager insurance amount? One of the basic personal finance principles as far as Insurance concerned is under-insurance at times leaves no trace of insurance when it fails to serve the purpose for what it was effected. This is because insurance on Human Life should be sought keeping in mind, the financial loss that the family would suffer in the absence of insured person.

One might ask why Central Government Employees should depend on Group Insurance Scheme (CGEGIS) when he is not barred from insuring his life on his own by opting for insurance policies offered by LIC or other private Insurance Companies.

But, wise men would always advocate in favour of Group Insurance only because of the advantages of getting insured as a group. Especially, Group insurance plans have low premiums. Such plans are particularly beneficial to those for whom other regular policies are a costlier proposition.

Moreover, Group Insurance Premiums are based on head count of the group insured. Obviously, When the group sought to be insured is having more number of employees premium collected per employee would get substantially reduced.

The real advantage of Group Insurance that More Insurance Cover a lesser premium can be enjoyed by the employees if Government reviews the existing CGEGIS and makes some small changes such as providing enhanced Insurance cover after reasonably increasing the premium per head.

To commensurate with the present inflationary trend, a reasonable minimum Insurance cover under CGEGIS has to be fixed, say Rs.5 lakhs.

From the employees side, justifiable increase in the premium by the government for providing adequate insurance cover should readily be accepted as the premium we pay for the existing Group Insurance is very negligible. Government can not provide a decent insurance cover with the such a small premium we pay now.

Under the existing CGEGIS the premia is Rs.10 per month for Rs.10,000 sum assured. This rate is more or less equivalent to the rate of premia for the sum assured pertaining to Group Savings Linked Insurance Scheme offered by LIC of India. But the major difference is Life Insurance cover offered by LIC under this Group Insurance Scheme is considerably higher. Hence, the Group Insurance offered by LIC could be taken as a benchmark for revising CGEGIS.

To conclude, there is an immediate need in revising CGEGIS to provide for more insurance cover as the existing scheme was devised almost 30 years back after which three pay commissions were formed by Government for revision of salary and allowances.

Friday, July 20, 2012

தோழியர்களுக்கு  ஒரு மகிழ்ச்சி 

CCL  மறுக்கக்கூடாது என  சண்டிகர் CAT  உன்னத தீர்ப்பு 


19 July 2012


Chandigarh, this the 30th day of September, 2011

CORAM: Hon'ble Mrs. Shyama Dogra, Member (J). Hon'ble Mrs. Promilla Issar, Member (A).

Mrs. Aarti Rani, wife of Shri Ashwani Kumar, aged 39 years, presently working as Postal Assistant in Post Office Sector-15, Chandigarh (U.T.)-160015.
1. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry Communication & Information Technology, Department of Posts, Dak Bhawan, Sansad Marg, New Delhi-110016.
2. Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Chandigarh Division, Sector-17, GPO Building, Chandigarh (UT)-160017.

Present: Sh. D.R. Sharma, the counsel for the applicant.
Sh. Rohit Sharma, vice Sh. Deepak Agnihotri, the counsel for the respondents.

O R D E R(Oral)
By Hon'ble Mrs. Shyama Dogra, Member (J):-

1. This is a second round of litigation by the applicant for quashing of impugned order Annexure A-1 dated 30.8.2011 whereby, her request to grant her child care leave has been rejected by the respondents.
2. The claim of the applicant is that Govt. of India issued office memorandums dated 11.9.2008 and 07.9.2010. Under those memorandums, women employees having minor children are to be granted Child Care Leave (CCL for short) for a maximum of two years during their entire service period for taking care of up to two children till the age of 18 years for the purpose of their care and taking care of any of their needs like examinations, sickness etc. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has twins, who are pursuing their studies in 10+1, Non-Medical. Since the husband of the applicant is posted at a far-away place in Amritsar, the applicant has to look after these two children, therefore, she had applied for child care leave, which has been denied by the respondents by passing a non-speaking order. Aggrieved by that order, the applicant had filed an O.A and her case was remanded to the respondents to re-examine the matter afresh and pass speaking orders. Impugned order annexure A-1 is an outcome of those directions given by the Court.
3. While challenging this impugned order, the main contention of the applicant is that since these office memorandum are for the purpose of giving some relief to eligible women employees to enable them to look after their children properly, therefore, the respondents should not have rejected her request for CCL, keeping in view the fact that earlier also she was granted this leave for three months when the applicant had to look after her children during their final examination. It is not denied by the applicant that this special child care leave cannot be claimed as a matter of right, yet the fact remains that this leave is to be granted for a particular purpose as mentioned in these instructions, therefore, if the applicant is not granted this leave the whole purpose of this scheme formulated for the benefit of women employees will be defeated. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant will not be able to take this leave after 2013 as her children will become major by that time and their exams would be over.
4. The learned counsel for the applicant has also objected to the findings given by the competent authority with regard to shortage of staff in Chandigarh Postal Division on the ground that earlier also the applicant was posted to other post offices in Sector 36 and sector 44 which falsify the plea of the respondents that there is a shortage of staff as the applicant at present also is working in sector-15 Post office. She has categorically mentioned that out of the total strength of 486 permanent posts of postal assistants, 455 postal assistants are on the rolls, hence there is no shortage of staff and in case she is granted CCL, there is still a provision for appointment of an incumbent against a leave vacancy and the respondents can make necessary arrangements for such period for which the applicant has applied for CCL.
5. The respondents have filed a written statement and have supported the impugned order on the ground that the applicant has not exhausted all the departmental remedies before coming to this Court, therefore, this O.A. is premature and liable to be dismissed as she can still file a representation to the higher authority against the impugned order Annexure A-1. The respondents have also categorically mentioned that grant of CCL cannot be asked for as a matter of right by the women employees and it can only be granted under special circumstances and she was also granted this leave during the final examination of her children and therefore, it cannot be said that the respondents are not considerate to women employees in the matter of grant of CCL. The plea of the applicant for grant of this leave has been rejected by the competent authority in view of the instructions of DOPT dated 18.11.2008 (R/2) in the interest of smooth functioning of the office and keeping in view that if CCL is granted in routine, then the office work would suffer in various departments. Since the applicant has not mentioned any valid reason for grant of this leave, therefore, there is no illegality in passing of the impugned order Annexure A-1, which is fully supported with reasons and the same is liable to be upheld.
6. The applicant has filed a rejoinder and reiterated the submissions as made in the O.A.
7. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and carefully gone through the record.
8. The instructions issued by the respondents on 11th September, 2008 and clarifications issued later on, clearly envisage that CCL cannot be demanded as a matter of right but the fact remains that this benefit has been given to the women employees to facilitate them so that they can devote adequate time to the care of their minor children upto the age of 18 years, which may be for the purpose of their up-bringing to look after any of their specific needs like examinations, sickness etc. This leave can be granted for a maximum of 3 spells in a year.
9. Therefore, once a particular scheme is introduced by the employer for the benefit of its employees, it should be implemented in a fair and rational manner and we are of the view that the respondents need not have completely rejected the request of the applicant for CCL as she needs this leave for the purpose of devoting some extra time to her minor children. Instead of completely rejecting her request, the respondents should have considered sympathetically her prayer for grant of CCL around the examination time.
10. Therefore, in our considered opinion, the matter requires re-examination. Thus, the impugned order dated 30.8.2011 (Annexure A-1) is hereby quashed and set aside while giving directions to the respondent concerned to consider sympathetically the prayer of the applicant for grant of CCL in different spells during and around the examination period of her children. Needful be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
11. With these directions as above, this O.A. stands disposed of with no orders as to costs.


Place: Chandigarh.
Dated: 30.9.2011.

01.01.2006 முதல்பணியில்சேர்ந்தGDS ஊழியர்களுக்குஊதியநிர்ணயம்

குறித்தவிளக்கஆணை.நமதுSPM தோழர்கள்தங்கள்அலுவலகத்தில்

01.01.2006 க்கு        பிறகுபணியில்சேர்ந்தGDS MINIMUM STAGE ல் 

இருந்தால்நமக்குதெரிவிக்கவும்.இதுநமது கடமை .

Thursday, July 19, 2012

மனமேவசப்படுகுறித்துஉங்கள் கருத்துக்கள் வரவேற்க்கப்படுகின்றன -SKJ    


18 July 2012

மாநிலசங்க செய்திகள்

Holding of PA/SA Direct Recruitment for 2011 & 2012 through approved Outsourced Agency

2011 மற்றும் 2012 ஆண்டுகளுக்கான எழுத்தர் காலியிடங்களுக்கான நேரடி தேர்வு என்பது objective type - Multiple Choice Questions அடிப்படையில் நடக்க உள்ளது . இது M/S CMC Ltd என்ற தனியார் தேர்வு நிறுவனம் மூலம் நடத்திடப் பட இலாக்காவால் ஒப்புதல் வழங்கப் பட்டுள்ளது .

அதற்கான விரிவான இலாக்கா சுற்றறிக்கையினைப் பார்க்க கீழே 'கிளிக்' செய்யவும்.

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

       நமது கோட்டச் செயலர் மாறுதல் குறித்து மாநிலசங்கம்  மதுரை 

மண்டல அலுவலகத்திற்கு  எழுதிய கடிதத்தின்  நகல்  . ALL INDIA  POSTAL  EMPLOYEES   UNION  GROUP ‘ C’,                               
                            TAMILNADU CIRCLE ,  ANNA SALAI,    CHENNAI  600 002.
            J.SRIVENKATESH                                                         J. RAMAMURTHY                                              A. VEERAMANI
            PRESIDENT                                                                  CIRCLE  SECRETARY                             CIRCLE FIN . SECRETARY                 
            9444226540                                                          9600880953, 9843370580                                                     9444208159

No.P3 / 2-66/Tirunelveli                                                                                                                                                 Dated the  18.07.2012

The Postmaster General,
Southern Region,
Madurai 625 002.

                                Sub:  Request  for transfer to  the Divisional Secretary, Tirunelveli  Dvl. Branch to the
                                          Headquarters  office  viz. Palayankottai HPO under  immunity grounds – Reg.
                                Ref: 1. This union letter  of even no. dt. 13.06.2012.
                                        2. Your office letter No. STA/102-20/2012 dt. 06.07.2012.

Kindly refer to the letters cited on the subject  mentioned ,  wherein  under  ref. item 2 above,  we have been  requested  to confirm   the  Headquarters of the  AIPEU   GR. C,  Tirunelveli  Branch ,  inter-alia means  either  Tirunelveli  or  Palayankottai.

In this connection  , our Circle Union  is bringing the following  to  your kind notice and  for taking  further action on  our  letter cited under reference.

1.       As per  article 36 of the  Constitution of our Union , the headquarters of the Divisional Union  shall be  where the  headquarters  of  the  Divisional Heads are situated. 

2.       As per article  37 (A) (i) of the Constitution of our Union , the Divisional Branch means the administrative jurisdiction of the Divisional Superintendent.  In case of  Tirunelveli  Divisional  Union,  presently  there exists only one branch  and it  is functioning  at Palayankottai  town, where the  Divisional  Head  is   functioning. The Constitution of our Union is  approved  by the  Department  and stands holds good  for all purposes.

3.       As per the  consolidated circular  of the Dte. vide  No.69/18/70-SPB I   dt. 7.12.70, the office bearers working at other stations  are elected to those offices, namely  Chief Executive or General Secretary, Secretary, Asst. Secretary and Financial Secretary, they may be brought  on  transfer to the headquarters of the union . This  is again reiterated  in para (ii) of the Dte.  letter No. 69/52/72-SPB I  DT. 23.3.73  viz.  “the order of Department of Personnel  circulated in this  office letter regarding  bringing  the Chief Executive of the Union  to their headquarters  should also be followed”.

We  request  the PMG, SR,  therefore,  kindly  to consider  the case  and  to grant   transfer to the  elected  Divisional Secretary   Sri. S.K. Jacob raj, under immunity grounds, to the  Headquarters  unit  viz. Palayankottai HPO  .

With regards,


              நன்றி .JR 

                  அன்புடன்   SKJ 

SB Order 09/2012 - Introduction of the Depositor at the time on opening of saving Account - Clariffcation

17 July 2012

Introduction of the Depositor at the time on opening of saving Account - Clarification

16.07.2012  ஆர்ப்பாட்டபுகைப்படங்கள் 

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

சம்மேளன   அறிக்கை  -பாராளுமன்ற பேரணி 

 -நமது கோட்டச் சங்கத்தின் சார்பாக 

தோழர்கள்  ஜேக்கப்ராஜ் ,வண்ணமுத்து .தியாகராஜன் உள்ளிட்ட 

தோழர்கள் பங்கேற்கின்றனர் .  

DELHI CHALO – Preparations in all Circles hectic
Thousands of Comrades are reaching Delhi to participate in 26th July March To Parliament called by the Confederation demanding 7th Pay Commission, 50% DA Merger etc.

An All India NFPE Convention will be held on the same day afternoon in Ambedkar Bhawan, Rani Jhansi Road, New Delhi – 110055 in front of VIDEOCON TOWER [ near Jhandewalan Metro Rail Station].

Dharna before Parliament exclusively on GDS Demands will be held on 27th July as per the call of the AIPEU GDS NFPE in which all NFPE comrades coming to March to Parliament shall also participate.


கோட்டச்   செய்திகள் 


நமது  கோட்டத்தில்  இன்று கூடுகிறது .

16.07.2012 ஆர்ப்பாட்டத்தில்   கலந்து  கொண்ட அனைத்து  தோழர்களுக்கும் 

கோட்டச்  சங்கத்தின்  சார்பாக  நன்றியை தெரிவித்துக் கொள்கிறோம் .  


Monday, July 16, 2012

         மாநில  சங்க    அறைகூவல் -  இன்று பாளையில்  ஆர்ப்பாட்டம் 

                  அனைவரும்   வருக   வருக 



தமிழகம் தழுவிய அளவில் அனைத்துக் கோட்ட /கிளைகளிலும்
கண்டன ஆர்பாட்டம்

சேலம் மேற்கு கோட்டக் கண்காணிப்பாளரின் தொழிலாளர் விரோத, தொழிற்சங்க விரோதப் போக்கைக் கண்டித்தும்,

ஊழியர்கள் மீது காழ்ப்புணர்ச்சியில் எடுக்கப்பட்ட பழிவாங்கும் நடவடிக்கைகளை ரத்து செய்திடக் கோரியும்,

போலி ரசீது தயாரித்துக் கொடுத்து முறைகேடாக பெற்ற பணம்
ரூ 1,40,000.00 –த்தை உடனடியாக அவரிடமிருந்து பிடித்தம் செய்யவும்,
அவர் மீது ஒழுங்கு நடவடிக்கை எடுக்கக்கோரியும்,

தொழிற்சங்கம் அளித்த புகார்கள் மீது இதுவரை எவ்வித நடவடிக்கையும் எடுக்காத நிர்வாகத்தை கண்டித்தும்,

தமிழ் மாநிலச் சங்க அறைகூவலை ஏற்று தமிழகம் தழுவிய அளவில் மாபெரும் கண்டன ஆர்பாட்டம்

சென்னை பெருநகரத்தில் உள்ள கோட்டங்களை ஒன்று திரட்டி
CPMG அலுவலக வாயிலில்

மாபெரும் கண்டன ஆர்ப்பாட்டம்


நாள்: 16.07.2012 திங்கள் மதியம் 1.00 மணி இடம்: CPMG அலுவலகம் முன்பு

விளக்கவுரை: தோழர் J. ஸ்ரீவெங்கடேஷ் மாநிலத் தலைவர்
தோழர் J. ராமமூர்த்தி மாநிலச் செயலர்
தோழர் A. வீரமணி மாநில நிதிச் செயலர் / உதவி பொதுச் செயலர்

கடிவாளம் இல்லாத குதிரையாய் தறிகெட்டு ஓடும் இதுபோன்ற ஊழல் அதிகாரிகளுக்கு எச்சரிக்கை மணியடிக்க, அவர்தம் கொட்டத்தை அடக்க, துறையின் நட்டத்தை தவிர்க்க அனைவரும் வீறுகொண்டெழுந்து அலை கடலென ஆர்ப்பரித்து ஆர்பாட்டத்தில் தவறாது கலந்துகொண்டு நீதியை
நிலைநாட்ட வாரீர்! வாரீர்!!


குறிப்பு : குறிப்பு : குறிப்பு : குறிப்பு

அனைத்துக் கோட்ட/கிளைச் செயலர்களும் தவறாமல் தங்கள் போட்ட ஆர்ப்பாட்ட சுற்றறிக்கையின் நகல் மற்றும் கடிதத் தந்தியினை
PMG, WESTERN REGION மற்றும் CHIEF PMG, ஆகியோருக்கு அவர்கள் பெயரில் கண்டிப்பாக அனுப்பி வைக்கவும் .

அதன் நகலை மாநிலச் செயலருக்கு அனுப்பவும்.

அப்போதுதான் இந்தப் போராட்டத்தின் வீச்சு தமிழகம் முழுவதும்
உள்ளதாத நிர்வாகத்திற்கு தெரிய வரும் .
எதிர்காலத்தில் ஊழியர் விரோத/ஊழல் அதிகாரிகளைக்
கண்டித்து நடைபெறும் எந்தப் போராட்டத்திற்கும் இது ஒரு
முன்னோட்டமாக இருக்க வேண்டும் . எப்போதும் போல ,
பிறகு பார்த்துக் கொள்ளலாம் என்று இருக்காதீர்கள்